Legal Cases Against Christian Belief Objections

My wife works at a cupcake bakery and so there are a couple of cases that I’ve been following for her work that I believe are setting a precedent for a successful lawsuit against a church at some point in the future. I believe that regardless of a church enforcing the covenant membership requirements established by the denomination, it is only a matter of time before the church is engaged in this debate.

Cases That Set A Precedent
January 2014
Sweet Cakes Bakery
- Refusal to make a same sex wedding cake

August 2013
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock 309 P. 3d 53 – NM: Supreme Court 2013
- Refusal to take pictures at a same sex commitment ceremony

May 2013
CHARLIE CRAIG and DAVID MULLINS v. MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, INC., and any successor entity, and JACK C. PHILLIPS
- Refusal to make a same sex wedding cake

April 2013
ROBERT INGERSOLL and CURT FREED, v. ARLENE’S FLOWERS, INC., d/b/a ARLENE’S FLOWERS AND GIFTS; and BARRONELLE STUTZMAN
- Refusal to provide flowers for a same sex wedding

These cases are being found in favor of the plaintiff’s on the grounds of equality and discrimination. Also, these cases are establishing a precedence that will allow not only the church but also the pastor to be held liable on the grounds of discrimination and equality. This is possible because there are other cases that have established the groundwork for determining discrimination against homosexuality.

Supporting Cases
2003
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 575, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508 (2003)
“When homosexual conduct is made criminal by the law of the State, that declaration in and of itself is an invitation to subject homosexual persons to discrimination.”

1993
Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 270, 113 S.Ct. 753, 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993)
“While it is true that the law applies only to conduct, the conduct targeted by this law is conduct that is closely correlated with being homosexual. Under such circumstances, [the] law is targeted at more than conduct. It is instead directed toward gay persons as a class.”

1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, upheld the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, a milestone enactment which, among other achievements, declared invidious discrimination unlawful, not just by the state but by private citizens, when providing goods and services in the sphere of public accommodations. The Act declared: “`All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion or national origin.’” Id. at 247, 85 S.Ct. 348.

What does all this mean?
I believe that there is a significant possibility that a court could rule in favor of the plaintiff against a church and it’s pastor/pastors on the grounds of discrimination rooted in the fact that churches are taking advantage of the 501(c)(3) tax-exemption status from the IRS and are thus considered public entities who provide a service that is open to the public. I believe that unless the Johnson Amendment is repealed and/or churches abscond their 501(c)(3) tax status, then churches who fail to perform same-sex marriages will experience the same defeat the the bakers, photographers and florists have. Repealing the Johnson Amendment needs to happen to protect free speech in this great nation.

How can churches protect themselves?
It seems to me that the best position the local church can take to avoid this type of legal action is to clearly establish a protocol and process for being wed within the church. This established protocol and process would permit pastors to clearly explain what is expected and what is not expected for people who wish to be wed within the church. This established process can be as simple as a written document that outlines requirements for being wed within the church. These requirements can be things like attending premarital counseling, being a member of the church, having been together for more than a year, a willingness to submit to the biblical understanding of what marriage is versus the legal understanding of what marriage is, and other such things.

As I followed the cases I shared earlier it seems to me that those individuals and organizations were found at fault because they chose to make decisions based on their biblical understanding and what they believed rather than intentionally purposefully protecting themselves in a very legal and structured manner. Because those individuals and organizations failed to have a written document that clearly outlines the requirements that they had for wedding cakes, photography and wedding flowers that seems to be something that was missing in their cases.

That’s my thoughts on the matter. What are your thoughts and what have I missed?

Pastoral Transition Thoughts

Over the course of the next 8-12 weeks, Pastors and churches around the country will be in periods of transition. Most pastors will be transitioning from one church to another. Other pastors will be accepting the call for the first time. Yet, the … [Continue reading]

The DNA of Jesus Christ in Giving

This is beautiful. I Like Car from ILikeGiving.com on Vimeo. … [Continue reading]

The Discipline Factor

"As a follower of Christ, it is not enough to be a good Christian, I desire to be a Great Christian and the significance between good and great lies directly in the spiritual and personal disciplines I practice daily." ~ John Howell … [Continue reading]

Beware the Bedazzler

My wife is an avid reader ... okay avid is not really the right word. My wife is an unstoppable reader ... still not the right word. My wife has all three generations of Kindles and she burns through books faster than 300 foxes running through a corn … [Continue reading]

Diagnosing the Organizational Structure of the Church

As this writers primary mode of experience is within the church, this post will speak into that mindset. The entrepreneurial organizational form is the one that is most familiar in the Church however, based on this week’s readings, it appears that … [Continue reading]

The Servant Leader Paradox Poem

The paradoxes of being a "Servant-Leader" poem (p29) Strong enough to be weak Successful enough to fail Busy enough to make time Wise enough to say "I don't know" Serious enough to laugh Rich enough to be poor Right enough to say "I'm … [Continue reading]

The Dream Church

Love this list posted by Asbury Seminary - Fantastic! 1.     I dream of a church that is more interested in repentance than recruitment. 2.    I dream of a church that is more concerned with the health of its body than the size of its … [Continue reading]

A Prayer for President Obama

Pastor Dan Delzell Wellspring Lutheran Church Papillion, Nebraska Almighty God, Thank you for giving us your Son as our Redeemer. Thank you that His kingdom shall have no end. Wash away my sins Lord Jesus, and give me O Holy Spirit a love for the … [Continue reading]

The Paradox of our Times

By Dr. Bob Moorehead Overlake Christian Church Seattle, WA The paradox of our time in history is that we have taller buildings, but shorter tempers; wider freeways, but narrower viewpoints; we spend more, but have less; we buy more, but enjoy it … [Continue reading]